April 4,
2013
This past
weekend saw a breakthrough in negotiations between the US Chamber of Commerce
and several national unions, over the creation of and
(primarily) the number of new “W” visas that will be created by the highly
anticipated reform legislation that has been negotiated by the so-called “Gang
of Eight” in the US Senate. This W
visa will be available for essential workers who will fill year round
jobs that do not require a college level education (construction,
manufacturing, service industries, etc.).
The W visa appears to be
a compliment to the part of the reform bill that will allow millions of
undocumented workers now in the US to apply for legal status. The
majority of those essential, undocumented workers
would register for temporary legal status, with the possibility of obtaining
permanent resident status some ten years later, and then ultimately citizenship
after 3 years as a permanent resident. These workers so far do not
have a name for their future legal status,
but whatever it is, they will continue to fill millions of jobs that US workers
are not willing or available or able
to do.
The W will be a complimentary visa, because it is
designed to address future labor needs (“future flow”) that employers will
need, after the registration process is complete and the current undocumented
population is entered into the system. Under the Senate proposal, the W
program will not be activated until April 1, 2015. The Gang of Eight appear to want to let the labor
market settle down in the next two years, and then let the new W visa system
accommodate the future demand that employers will have going forward.
The proposed “W” visa contained in the Senate bill has some important aspects:
1.
The number of these visas will start at 20,000
the first fiscal year, with 35,000 the next year, then 55,000 the next and
75,000 in the fourth. Beginning in the fifth fiscal year, the number will vary depending on a
statistical formula.
2.
The total of such W visas cannot exceed 200,000, and can never be less than 20,000, in a given year.
3.
A separate provision will allow a qualified employer to hire an appropriate W
worker, if the annual cap has been reached, upon paying a special fee. No
comment yet on whether anything else would have to be proven to make such a
hire.
4.
Employers of such W workers will have to pay the
employee the prevailing wage or the actual wage the employer agrees to pay,
whichever is higher.
5.
The bill will create a new bureau within USCIS
to implement the formula and determine the number of W visas available each
year.
6.
The bureau also will publish a labor shortage
list, and shortage occupations will have priority for the available W visas.
7.
However, it appears that no more than 15,000
visas will be available for the construction industry in a given year, regardless of the extent of a shortage for that
industry.
8.
W employees would be able to accept a job offer
from another employer that is certified as
eligible to use the W program, and once the W worker left the first job, he or
she would have 60 days to find another
qualified employer.
9.
Employers who have laid off workers within 90
days, or who have a strike or lockout in process, are not eligible.
10.
The employer must pay all filing and other fees
under the program and cannot pass them on to the employees.
11.
The W employee will have a way to move to permanent resident status, and
eventually to citizenship.
This program has some strong similarities
to the current H-1B program. Both are limited in number (H-1Bs are limited to 65,000 per year, although we understand
that this bill will increase the number of H-1Bs as well). Both will have filing dates of April 1. Both
require the employer to pay at least the prevailing wage as determined by
DOL. Although the prevailing wage requirement is criticized by both
labor and business, when it is followed, it does serve a valid purpose.
The same is true regarding the provision that will allow the W employee to
“port” to another qualified employer, just as an
H-1B worker can move. Like H-1B’s, these W visa holders will have some
method to move to LPR status.
One troubling aspect of the W program is the 15,000 yearly
limit on construction jobs. This is government interference in market economics at its worst, without any
recognition of the fluctuating needs of what
is arguably the most important engine in our national economy. With the
coming debate, the construction industry should exercise
every opportunity to have this provision removed or modified
significantly,, allowing the market to determine
which industries and which employers can exercise their rights to sponsor
workers for the W visa .
In short, the new W visa represents a mixture of government
regulation and allowance for free market activity by the employer and the
employee. It is not a perfect model, but it is a workable start in
an area that has needed attention for some 50 years.
The final format of the visa is almost sure to change during the coming debate
and perhaps after experience shows that the original model needs
modification.
Stay tuned.
Gerry Chapman
No comments:
Post a Comment